20 Jun
2007
20 Jun
'07
9:09 p.m.
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, Ethan Dicks wrote:
On 6/20/07, Roger Ivie <rivie at ridgenet.net>
wrote:
I don't know anything about the internals, so I can't say. Although
AFAIK core was pretty much gone by the time the T-11 happened, it may have
been based on an earlier design that did interface to core.
--
roger ivie
rivie at ridgenet.net
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, Allison wrote:
> It's an easy cpu to interface and use...
However, it's not without its obnoxious bits.
On the T-11, all writes are performed as read-modify-writes.
Hmm... was that because of the needs of core memory, or was it just to
simplify some aspect of its internal design?