10 Jun
2005
10 Jun
'05
9:31 a.m.
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, Michael Sokolov wrote:
Fred Cisin <cisin at xenosoft.com> wrote:
Which makes you wonder: is one any better than the other? Since they've
been around forever, they must be either equally "good" or equally
"bad",
otherwise one or the other would've disappeared long ago.
(If a great explosion is heard in the vicinity of southern California it
was most likely Michael's head after he reads this.)
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
[ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ]
[ and academia at www.VintageTech.com || at http://marketplace.vintage.org ]
Thank you, Michael, for clarifying that
Apple's choice to go Intel
is NOT an engineering, NOR a marketing decision,
but is in reality an intergalactic conspiracy.
I made my post in response to Eric's comments regarding DRM and Richard
Stallman's prophetic "Right to read" story, not in response to Apple's
choice to go Intel.
I couldn't care less about what CPU Apple uses - that's utterly
insignificant on the cosmic scale. Technology changes, but the epic
struggle between good and evil, between Light and darkness, and between
freedom and tyranny stays the same.