Well, IMHO, Win95 was rather close to a real multitasking system, at
least for Win32 programs. Maybe not as good as Linux or even NT, but
it got the job done and got it done significantly better than 3.x
And before people go bashing 95 anymore, I want to go on record as
saying it's one of the few M$ products I actually like. It runs well
on even a 486 with only 8 MB of RAM (already an almost obsolete config
by the time Win95 came out) and has one of the cleanest, nicest GUIs
around (bested at the time only by NeXT and OS/2 WPS)