This is all academic, since I am certainly not going to apply for said
job. There's no way I could contemplate crossing the Pond for one thing.
[...]
Sr. Server Engineer
Is iths a 'server engineer' or a 'sevice engineer'? My first thought is
tha the latter is a better description. I don't see much that is to do
with servers in the accepted sense.
Ahving read the full job description, requirements, etc, I must admit I
am somewhat depressed. Even if I say so myself, I think I have some clue
about repairing and maintaining vintage systems. And yet I meet none of
the requirements. Now you may well not want somebody like me, I can fully
understnad that.
I do think the 'requriements' are peculiar. For one thing you require
somebody who is familiar with certain things (such as Microsoft Office).
Now, I'll admit I've never used said programs, preferign to use LaTeX for
test formatting, and never having had any use for a spreadsheet. But I am
prepared to wager that if I had to use them, I'd be able to pick them up
in an afternoon, and would abnybody else who had sufficient knowledge of
computer hardware and software to be able to do the rest of the job. Alas
HR departments don't grasp this.
You also seem to want somebody which experience in wildiy differnt areas.
If you're not carefulm, you're going to get somebody who's dabbled in all
sorts of things rather than somebody who is an expert in a particular
area. Maybe that's what you want. Prsonally, I'd rather have a true
expert in a particular field (who is very likely to be able to pick up
related fields very quicking) than a 'jack of all trades and master of none'.
And you seem to perpetuate the myth that nobody can be self-taught in
these fields, by requiring a degree and field service experience.
With reference to the latter, I would argue that the requirements of
field service (being able to get the machine up and running quickly,
original spares avaialble, known-good asemblies to swap out avaialbe,
etc) are very differnt form the requirements of a museum (keeping the
machien as original as possible, some parts may have to be made, or
adapted, no-known-good spare boards, etc) are very different. You may be
good at one and awful at the other. So asking for field service
experience may not be what you want
I think it woudl also be useful to specify the sorts of machines (or
approximate dates) involved. My experience suggests that troubleshooting
a transistorised machine is somewhat different from troubleshooting an
SSI/MSI based machine which is in turn differnet from troubleshooting a
microprocessor-based machine. Perhaps you want to cover all of them, it's
not clear.
Oh well, as I said it's academic anyway. had it been over here, I might
well have given it a go, though.
-tony