>>>> "Tony" == Tony Duell
<ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk> writes:
Tony> I suppose you could include the Pro 325 and 350 (no I/D, F11
Tony> chip) and the Pro 380 (split I/D, J11 chip). But those will not
Tony> run normal PDP11 software, the I/O is totally different I
Tony> believe.
It certainly is -- different and very badly conceived. But then
again, Unibus and Q-bus are also different (though not by the same
Unibus and Qbus are actually quite similar, to the extent that devices
for either bus generally look the same to the software (the DL11 and
DLV11 serial ports have the same registers, same bit allocations, ditto
for the RK11 and RKV11 etc...). The logical ideas behind the bus -- the
types of bus cycle, the signals used, etc are also pretty similar.
The only issue comes if you get into 22 bit addressing, Qbus devices that
do DMA have 22 bit address registers, Unibus ones have 18 bit address
registers and the address goes via the Unibus Map to turn it into a 22 bit
address.
DEC sold a Unibus -> Qbus adapter (it requires that the CPU, or more
specifically the arbiter is on the Unibus side), the DW11-B that seems to
work well (I have had mo problems hanging any Q-bus device off my 11/45
using it). I believe there were 3rd party boards that went the other way.
-tony