4 Aug
2005
4 Aug
'05
1 p.m.
On Thursday 04 August 2005 13:49, Tony Duell wrote:
Please, not this argument again...
What he meant is "good enough" quality, for producing calendars or books
from. A 20"x20" piece of sheet film isn't necessary for doing that,
and a few k$ (or perhaps less) digital camera can produce "good enough"
photos. In fact, I'd argue that to most people (Tony, as you should
know, you're not 'most people') a $300-$500 digital camera will produce
"good enough" results.
Tony, I think what you call "good quality" most people would call
"excessive quality". :)
Pat
--
Purdue University Research Computing --- http://www.rcac.purdue.edu/
The Computer Refuge --- http://computer-refuge.org
How about
taking good quality digital photos of the exhibits and
then
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
That is surely a contradiction in terms