31 May
2020
31 May
'20
12:06 a.m.
On 5/30/2020 11:15 PM, Eric Smith via cctalk wrote:
On 05/29/2020 02:38 PM, Noel Chiappa via cctalk
wrote:
> <snip>
> Low-level machines did not even have storage protection
> keys, and on the /40 and /50 (I think) it was an option,
> although I'd guess almost any /50 had it installed.
Our /50 had it and I
have never seen any indication in the documentation
for the hardware that
indicated that it was an option.
I don't think that either MVT or MFT would have been very stable without
it.? I certainly spent a lot of time
studying how to get around it, and am responsible for a couple of SPIE
patches in the MVT product
from exploits trying to get into supervisor mode to
muck with such.
Yes, I know supervisor state isn't tied to the storage keys, but that
was the way I went to
try to circumvent the storage keys.
thanks
Jim