16 Apr
2003
16 Apr
'03
8:26 a.m.
From: "Fred Cisin (XenoSoft)"
<cisin(a)xenosoft.com>
On Wed, 16 Apr 2003, Kurtk7 wrote:
> The 8" disks are not so much a problem, but from what I can tell, there were
> 2.0, 2.5, 2.8, 3.0, 3.25, and 4.0 inch formats and finding even one example
I don't know that 8 inch were all that regular. You have 16
hard sectored and 32 hard sectored. You even have a hard sectored with
the holes around the outside of the disk instead of the center.
Now, add single/double density and single/double sided.
Dwight
Also:
2.9"
3.9"
and, of course,
5.25" (soft-sector, hard-sector (10 and 16), twiggy)
3.5" (early ones without shutter, manual shutter, one-way shutter,
floptical)