7 Nov
2007
7 Nov
'07
2:47 p.m.
On 2007-11-07 18:58, Richard wrote:
Sridhar Ayengar <ploopster at gmail.com>
writes:
We had it running on a Wyse 286 back in them days. Can't have had more than
one, maybe two megabytes of RAM.
,xtG
.tsooJ
--
John was addicted to placebos until I sent him to a homeless
shelter for a week and told him it was a rehab clinic.
--
Joost van de Griek
<http://www.jvdg.net/>
> On 7 Nov 2007 at 10:21, ajones wrote:
>> There was never a version of Linux, or UNIX in general, less bloated
>> than Windows 95.
Umm... IIRC, Xenix was a unix implementation that didn't even require
virtual memory, ran on x86 architectures (386?) and required very
little memory; certainly much less than Win96 since Xenix was
available in 1986.