dvcorbin(a)optonline.net wrote:
Bwahahaha,
I've written 10 replies, but canceled them all, because I can't
teach a house
plant calculus. You Win.
On the other hand, I do keep tring to teach some of my outdoor plants geometery...
Seriously the TOTAL lack of regulation on "WallWarts" is quite common. I am
currently (preofessionally) developing a product which normally operates off of AC power
(via a wallwart), but needs to remort low AC conditions and fall back to battery.
The load on this device is VERY dynamic ranging from under 10mA to over 850mA depending on
what it is doing. The voltage fluctuations out of the wall wart (which is rated as 11.8V @
1A) will rise as high as 17V when under a minimal load.
Since the device is intended to have a very low production cost, they really cut some
regulation requirements on the board as well, since the components WILL tolerate this
range of voltages.
Unfortunately, the side effect is that the voltage variation based on load is
significantly greater than the voltage variation based on fluctuations in the AC (eg
during a brown out). This has required the development of software that is constantly
monitoriing the "active" state of many of the devices to "calculate"
the current load, and then going through a transform to estimate the RAW AC that is
providing power to the wart.
DAvid.
How low a production cost,? Can you do the regulation under program
control? Just a pass transistor, biased to
startup voltage, then use pwm to control the supply? Thats what I might
do. If the processor? if there is one?
can handle the load ( processing that is ), You might be able to skip
the ADC feedback loop if you can put the
switching requirements in a pre programmed table, with current
requirements depending on operating mode.
Jim Davis.