Pete Turnbull wrote:
Jules Richardson wrote:
Out of interest, why was the answer to the
"Only Amiga makes it possible"
advertising slogan question "because it can multi-task and run a
second OS"
(or words to that effect) - surely plenty of systems had existed
before the
Amiga which could do just that. They might have been big and
expensive, but
I'm sure it wasn't a new concept.
I think it's because it was the first home computer that could run two
OSs *at the same time* -- ISTR there was a way to run an MS-DOS and an
Amiga OS program at the same time.
Yeah, I remember having a PC emulator for my A500. It was sloooow, but it did
work.
Of course I suppose there was nothing stopping someone doing a two-OS machine
on a BBC micro with a suitable copro back in 1982, but I don't think anyone
ever did it (all the configurations that spring to mind took control of the
BBC side and used it purely as I/O)*
* did the A500 have any memory management hardware worth speaking of? I don't
*think* it did, but I could be wrong...
I suspect that Commodore's claim came with strings attached, and that the quiz
just didn't reproduce the fine print...
I got 11 out
of 30. I suck. :-)
That's the same as I got, which I thought was not too bad considering I
have avoided Amigas of all sorts.
:-)
I only ever had an A500 (and gained a second one by accident a few years ago
;) and I never have been big on remembering names for things, which seemed a
requirement for much of that quiz!
cheers
Jules