CP/M disk format: need help

Yes. (Well, not _my_ screen, but I can easily handle fetching a two-plus-meg picture and looking at it.) Here's a transcription of the display. This is a ten-finger copy and thus may include errors. There is what looks like reflection of a flash preventing part of the screen from being readable; I'm filling my guess at the relevant area with ***s. (By playing with contrast enhancement - severely stretching the brightest 1/40th or so of the histogram - I managed to read a few characters more than are apparent at first sight.) | DISPLAY A CP/M DIRECTORY | | Enter CP/M file name. If you specify a diskette drive (user | number is optional), it will override the selected CP/M drive. | You may include 'wild card' characters (* and ?) in the name. | ENTER will cause all files to be displayed: ***** | ******* | ******* | CDIR Ver. 1.44-Oct 21 1996, Copyright 1996, Sydex. All rights re*****d. | THIS IS AN UNREGIETERED COPY--SEE DOCUMENTATION FOR DETAILS. | Fabio Marverti Format | | * WARNING! * Out-of-range block number in directory. | -- You may be using the wrong disk definition | Block: 5000, FILE: PROG.COM | | A0:B A0:COPIA.COM A0:EXEC.COM A0:FCOPY.COM | A0:MAGLIA.HLP A0:MINSTALL.DAT A0:PACK.COM A0:PIP.COM | A0:PROG.COM A0:PROG.COM A0:PROG.COM A0:PROVA1.MMM | A0:PROVA1.MMM A0:PROVA1.MMM A0:STAT.COM A0:VERDSK.COM | | 1062K free on drive A: | Press any key to continue... | I'm actually not sure of the e and d on the "CDIR Ver..." line next to the obscured area; what I can see is consistent with the letters given, and it seems highly likely the partially obscured text is "reserved", but that e and d actually could for all I can tell be o and u or some such instead. It could. The picture is 3264x2448 pixels and shows not only the screen but the monitor's frame, a camera (or something like it) mounted on top of the monitor, and assorted miscellany in background - the only thing there that looks easily readable to me is the name "BON JOVI", but there are fragments of other things; none of the lot looks to me likely to be relevant to the thread. There is approximately no important loss of legibility in scaling it down by a factor of 4 in each dimension. A picture taken square-on without flash would have been substantially easier to read - hint, hint, for anyone taking such pictures. (If your camera doesn't know how to shut off flash, put something opaque in front of the flash - there's no point using flash when taking a picture of something self-luminant but not reflective.) /~\ The ASCII Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML mouse at rodents-montreal.org / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B