4 Dec
2002
4 Dec
'02
9 a.m.
On Tuesday, December 3, 2002, Sellam Ismail wrote:
> BTW, I must say that the new site looks quite pretty.
Thanks, but I wasn't satisfied. Since then
I've moved on to other looks.
What I need to know is this:
Should the ClassicCmp web site look new/fancy or
retro/simple?
In a way, I want to have a simple/retro look.
Recent ideas I've had include this one
(semi-fancy):
http://www.subatomix.com/etc/classiccmp/webdocs/
and this one (retro):
http://www.subatomix.com/etc/classiccmp2/
Well, I'd definitly prefer the simple style (I wouldn't
call it retro). Why ? well
1. there is even on a dual PIII 750 workstation a visible
faster rendering process (it's instant)
2. Data size - 3 K vs. 15 K
3. last but not least, it's well usable with literaly
any browser, including text browsers, and of course
versions for handicaped (*1) and browsers on classic
hardware.
Go for the simple one!
Gruss
H.
(*1) A special kind of handicaped are mobile users ...
--
VCF Europa 4.0 am 03./04. Mai 2003 in Muenchen
http://www.vcfe.org/