17 May
2004
17 May
'04
4:31 p.m.
On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 19:54, chris wrote:
I don't think it was *that* good. I'm certain it was only three numbers,
not four. It could well have been a 950 - given the dusty dirty skip it
was lying it it's not impossible to believe that dirt made the 5 look
like a 6 :-)
cheers
Jules
> Heh - I
don't really know Macs at all. I have '960' stuck in my head,
> but I had a quick look on lowendmac.com and didn't see that listed - I
> swear there was a 9 and a 6 in there (I don't think 690 was listed
> either, so who knows!).
UGH... go back and get it.
You probably left behind a PowerMac 9600! DAMN good Macs.