> Today? C
is quite possibly the most widely portable language there
> is. [...]
Having "C" is not the answer to every maiden's
prayer.
No, of course not. There are still machines with FORTRAN but not C;
there are more which support FORTRAN well and C badly. I just think
they are rare compared to the swamp of machines with C but no FORTRAN.
If you are interested in Scientific Programming then
it may be if
it's a small platform that whilst it has a "C" complier it doesn't
have the libraries you need to run your program.
Sure. But in that respect C is no different from FORTRAN. (The
presence of support aside, FORTRAN is usually a better language than C
for heavy numerical code, which is what "scientific programming"
usually means in my experience. FORTRAN was designed for that, while C
was designed as an OS implementation language. That neither is all
that great at the other's task is hardly a surprise.)
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse at
rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B