31 Jul
2013
31 Jul
'13
4:14 p.m.
At 5:34 ?pm +0100 2013/07/31, Liam Proven <lproven at gmail.com> wrote:
On 31 July 2013 17:18, <schoedel at kw.igs.net>
wrote:
Not at all; I didn't think so. As it happens, now that I have had a chance
to look at it, the network card in the machine is not one of UW's own, but
rather an IBM/Sytek PC LAN interface from 1984.
--
Kevin Schoedel <schoedel at kw.igs.net> VA3TCS
My memory tells me the card was contemporary and
from IBM, but I'll have
to pull
out the machine tonight to check. The machine is definitely the 16K
version with
cassette port. I assume it was part of the first of the systems
described in [1]
(probably paywalled) and in badly muddled form at [2].
Perhaps I should clarify: I was not doubting you or questioning your
machines, merely expressing my own first thought.