15 Jan
2013
15 Jan
'13
1:02 p.m.
On Jan 15, 2013, at 2:46 PM, Dan Gahlinger <dgahling at hotmail.com> wrote:
But I also agree with other posters, he should have
sold some of the collectionin order to save the rest of it, rather than lose it all, no
matter who was right.
Didn't Sellam try to do exactly that? He posted a message here a while ago offering to
sell anything in his collection or maybe just things he had duplicates of. In any case, I
think he *did* try to sell things to raise money. Maybe there just weren't enough
willing buyers.