----------------------------------------
From: dkelvey at
hotmail.com
To: cctalk at
classiccmp.org
Subject: RE: Lisp does NOT use RPN - Re: cctalk Digest, Vol 125, Issue 13
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 20:57:14 -0800
----------------------------------------
> Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 23:30:50 -0500
> From: toby at telegraphics.com.au
> To:
> Subject: Re: Lisp does NOT use RPN - Re: cctalk Digest, Vol 125, Issue 13
>
> On 08/01/14 10:52 PM, dwight wrote:
>> The thought was that Artificial Intelligence was a
>> rule based system.
>
> "Rule based systems" turn out to be incredibly useful. Do you ever use
> Google Maps?
>
> (Noting that the afore-mentioned Peter Norvig, who did a lot of work
> with symbolic AI, is Google's Director of Research. :)
>
> --Toby
>
>> Rule based systems can play a good game of Chess
>> but lack the ability to analyze and adapt to completely
>> different conditions, like go from a Chess game
>> to crossing a street safely.
>> The only intelligence if the fellow that came up with
>> the rules.
>> Adaptive Chess programs have some intelligence but
>> only limited.
>> Even my pet dog has more intelligence and I have a
>> particularly dumb dog.
>
>
>
>> Dwight
>>
>
Should read things before, sending correction below.
I didn't say it wasn't useful. In many, many, cases, it can out
do me. Even for my bad spelling, I use google to check that
the word is right. It is faster and more accurate than
I AM for what it does but it still lacks intelligence. It would
not pass the Turing test.
It is a tough one to pass and all the rule based programs
ever made or ever will be made couldN'T pass the Turing test
for long.
If I knew why that was true and could make an algorithm to
solve that, I would be sitting on a yacht off my new tropical
island.
Dwight