31 May
2020
31 May
'20
6:25 p.m.
Sent from my iPhone.
On May 31, 2020, at 9:16 PM, Bill Gunshannon
<bill.gunshannon at hotmail.com> wrote:
?On 5/31/20 8:35 PM, Mich.com wrote:
I remember the ?technical Computer center? people at Chrysler where I worked talking about
making the PL/M compiler run on our CDC Cyber computers (60-bit). It was a bit of work. I
seem to remember thinking it was written to run on an IBM mainframe, if that makes sense.
But they got it working and we used it until Intel came out with their 8080-based
development systems. Then we started using them to compile.
Dave
Sent from my iPhone.
As I recall, it was the cross compiler for PL/M that was written in FORTRAN.
But that came first, before any 8080-hosted PL/M compiler.
You are definitely right on that. I forget what it was intended to run
on, probably some minicomputer like a DEC System-10 or -20. Hmmm... I
wonder if it would compile with Fortran-80 on my TRS-80. That might be
fun to see. I even have corrected sources around here somewhere because
after all those years of people using it I found a few bugs in the two
sets of sources that were floating around the Internet. :-)
bill
On May
31, 2020, at 7:50 PM, Bill Gunshannon via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
?On 5/31/20 2:24 AM, Eric Smith via cctalk wrote:
On the other hand, Intel also had a FORTRAN-80
product, which was unrelated
to Microsoft FORTRAN-80. Intel FOTRAN-80 ran on their MDS development
systems under the ISIS-II operating system, and the compiler was written in
PL/M.
Which is even funnier when you realize that the PL/M compiler
was written in Fortran.
bill