It was thus said that the Great Patrick Finnegan once stated:
On Friday 28 May 2004 03:53, der Mouse wrote:
HTTP can do the same only to a point.
Since you seem to be in love with classic protocols, how about this...
at least for non-anonymous transfers, you could just use kermit to
transfer the file over an ssh connection. that'll handle all of your
ftp "corner cases" that http doesn't support (btw, most http servers do
support resuming file transfers these days), and adds functionality. I
don't think even ftp supports some things like changing filesystem
ACLs, or changing your password on the server, for instance.
It can, but by using the FTP SITE command to sneak then through. And
since it's a site specific implementation, changing ACLs on a VMS FTP server
will most likely be different changing ACLs on a UNIX FTP server.
For anonymous transfers, the only thing I can see
you'd want that http
doesn't provide (assuming a server and client that support resuming) is
transferring multiple files over a single TCP connection (I don't care
about), or transfering record-mode files from something like VMS (shove
them in an archive format that survives bit-mode transfers).
HTTP/1.1 can serve multiple requests on a single session; in fact, for
HTTP/1.1 that's the default connection type.
-spc (Okay, HTTP is complicated by the fact that there are three
versions of the protocol defined ... )