15 Aug
2011
15 Aug
'11
3:23 a.m.
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 09:19:29AM -0600, Richard wrote:
In article <20110812092801.GA23992 at
bytemark.barnyard.co.uk>,
David Cantrell <david at cantrell.org.uk> writes:
One of us is confused, certainly, but it could be me :-)
I was under the impression that the MD5 sums being bandied about were of
the index file.
--
David Cantrell | Enforcer, South London Linguistic Massive
EINE KIRCHE! EIN KREDO! EIN PAPST!
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 09:44:53AM -0700, Al
Kossow wrote:
You don't say explicitly, but
this output implies that this is the MD5
of the index text file, whereas others were posting the MD5 of the
disc ISO.
Am I wrong or confused? Thank you. I just discovered there are TWO
versions of this disk!
Make that three.
plough:walnut-creek-CDROM david$ md5sum 00-INDEX.TXT
516420e34e8129e430a6783ce216d424 00-INDEX.TXT