23 Jun
2013
23 Jun
'13
11:36 p.m.
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013, Jim Carpenter wrote:
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 12:26 AM, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
I very highly doubt they were quite THAT paranoid. ;)
It helps that I know the processor is a 6800 and that it's likely
compressed though!
Any ideas what the compression format might be?
I'm doubting something too
proprietary? If anything the decompression executable is in the PROMs...
I can't remember what type of compression it uses. Not sure I ever
knew. But you're right, it's probably not proprietary. Unless they
were really paranoid and wanted some security through obscurity, why
reinvent the wheel?
Jim
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects