10 Dec
1998
10 Dec
'98
9:56 a.m.
On Thu, 10 Dec 1998 Hans.Franke(a)mch20.sbs.de wrote:
Don't forget: the V(I)C-20 was a bit faster and a
way better
design then the C64.
I learned many things about the C64 recently.
First, that it was a underpowered, low quality computer that was more
expensive than an Apple ][ and had less features. I disagree because I
have never liked the Apple ][ more than the C64.
Second, I learn that the VIC-20, a predecessor to the C-64, was better
than it. How is this? Last I heard, it is the VIC that was underpowered
because it only had 8k ram or something like. Please explain; how was it
better?
--
Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
HRK
----------------------------------------------------
Max Eskin | kurtkilgor(a)bigfoot.com | AOL: kurtkilgor