Quoting Jim Davis <jimdavis(a)gorge.net>et>:
This from someone who rips apart computers for
wall hangings and
office trophies, then spams his "products" on multiple newsgroups.
Piss off AOL boy.
Spiffy. Mature too.
[Usenet flame mode on :-)]
So, does that mean that you're in agreement with those runners up for
the vice-presidency of the moron section of the knucklehead club who
tear classic computers apart so as to be able to use their bits for
wall hangings and office trophies, or to be immersed in clear epoxy
for sale on E-bilk as expensive paperweights and, hence, forever
useless as functional computer bits?
Boy, as far as flames go that was pretty uninspiring. I mean, wasn't I
supposed to get all frothy at the mouth and such? :)
As far as destroying functional computer equipment to sell as
knic-knacks. Ewww. That's just disgusting. Makes me want to run to the
nearest eye-wash station after reading a post even _discussing_ such
aberrant behavior!
> Well, I
don't like this OT crap either. I've never been on a list
> before that even came close to classiccmp's 80% OT-ness.
It's been one long, drawn out Midol Moment
around here for nearly two
weeks. Please take it elsewhere. I joined this list to be able to learn
more about old computers and maybe increase my stash of
goodies. Unfortunately, the list is being inundated with some of the most
bizarre socio-politicol folderol that I've ever seen. Occasionaly OT runs
Uh-oh, that comment warrants severe Usenet-style flamage... :-)
[Basil Fawlty Usenet flamethrower mode on]
Bizarre? You call what we've been discussing Bizarre? Let me guess,
you're a propagana artist from one of Big Brother's goon squads or
else you're some random politican's aid pretending to be a computer
collector, and you're working on "damage control," right? Ah, hah!
Just as we thought. Admit it, as vee haf vays uf making you talk.
[flames mode off]
That was a _little_ better, but it still made me smile. No froth to be
seen. *laughs*
are to be
expected. We're a very varied bunch with a pretty impressive
array of interests. Unfortunately, when the irrelevant totally overwhelms
the relevent, problems arrive, tempers flare and interesting people leave
the list. That's not fair to the rest of us left.
As someone else pointed out, this is definitely relevant to hacking.
Over in Europe, the looney one world government political plotters are
<ed
wollman> SNIP! </ed wollman>
I agree completely that the current situation in the US and other
countries warrant discussion, but unless you're referring to
anti-hacking/cracking statues passed in 1991 and prior, it's NOT topical
for this list.
g.