29 Apr
2017
29 Apr
'17
7:07 p.m.
If it is your only scope I recommend an analog scope of at least 100 MHz, with dual trace
and delayed sweep.
If you already have an analog scope, I recommend a logic analyzer instead of a digital
scope.
If you already have both above, I recommend a digital scope.
Dwight
________________________________
From: cctech <cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org> on behalf of Michael Thompson via
cctech <cctech at classiccmp.org>
Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2017 4:15:33 PM
To: allison
Cc: General Discussion: On-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: Oscilloscope Recommendation
Thanks for the recommendation
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 29, 2017, at 4:30 PM, allison
<allisonportable at gmail.com> wrote:
On 04/29/2017 01:28 PM, Michael Thompson via
cctech wrote:
The RICM just received $1,000 to buy a new oscilloscope. I would like a
four channel. and color would also be nice. The bandwidth doesn't need to
be high because we usually work on ancient equipment.
What would you suggest?
I use a RIgol DSO at work to replace a 200mhz Tek with power issues. Far better
scope.
For the money we paid, 4 channels and wide band its very decent. Being able to get
screen grabs to a USB stick is a big plus.
I personally have a Rigol DS815T spec analyser with tracking generator and its a good
performer.
Not up to the standards of a R&S FSH6 but about 1/15th the price.
Allison