If something "blew", there must be a major 'problem' somewhere
else! Did you find out why the board "blew"?
I've not even started my normal rant about board-swapping (rather than
repair) yet....
Anyway, I do feel that it is somewhat foolish to replace a part -- any
part -- withoug a clear idea of what the problem is. You might be looking
in totally the wrong area,. or the part might be being damaged by a fault
elsewhere...
The initial fault, IIRC, was that the lamp on the -15V regulator brick
wasn't lit. Now that doesn't even mean that the -15V rail is missing (the
lampe might have blown). I can think of many reasons why that lamp might
not light, including :
The lamp itself has burnt out
The -15V rail is missing due to a fault in the reuglator brick
The -15V rail is missing due to a shrot-circuit in on of the loads on
that rail (e.g. a serial card)
The input to the -15V regulator is missing due to a bad connection,
open-circuit transformer secondary winding, whatever
The +15V supply to the -15V regualtor is missing due to a fault on that
regulator board
The +15V input is missing due to a bad connection/broken wire between the
+15V board and the -15V brick
The +15V rail is missng due to a short in one of the loads on that rail
(e.g. a serial card)
The +15V rail is missing because the input to that regulator is missing
(brocken connection, open-circuit transformer secondary, etc)
It is pointless, IMHO, to go any further unless you know where to look,
and that means doing tests to eliminate some or all of those
posibilities. When you know where the fault is (e.g. you know the +15V
rail is misisng, you know the inputs to that board are OK, and the load
doesn't seem to be a dead short), then you can look at the next level
down and find, e.g. an open-circuit power transistor.
The best advice I was ever given for faultfinding (and it applies to
everything, not just classic computers) was 'Measure, think, then
repair'. Make measrurements and gather evidence. Think about what those
measurements are telling you (it may then be necessary to make more
measurements..). Then, and only them, start replacing components.
This may not be the modern way to repair things, but it's not let me down
yet (which is more than I can say about some other 'methods').
-tony