On Mar 18 2005, 10:07, Dwight K. Elvey wrote:
>From: "vrs" <vrs at msn.com>
>There, "run" caps are generally oil, and
"start" caps are
>generally electrolytic. The exception being the occasional
"start/run" cap,
whatever that
is.
I believe that refers to how it is used. During the start,
it is connected to a high current coil but during run, is
is connected to a high resistant one to create phase shift.
>The original caps in the TU56 are high capacitance, and clearly
>electrolytic. But they appear to be wired for continuous phase
shifting
>duty. Hence some of the people on the list
insisting that they are
"run"
caps, and that
the beefier, more expensive "run" cap should be used.
Most likely to make the motor run smoother, as though there
were more phases to the AC.
Simplified explanation: In "capacitor-start, capacitor-run" motors,
which run from single-phase AC, there are two sets of coils. The coils
need to be fed with AC out of phase with each other to cause the motor
to rotate. The AC supply is fed directly to one set of coils, and
through the capacitors to produce the phase shift for the second set of
coils. To start the motor, you need lots of current and a big phase
shift, so the "start" capacitor in parallel with the "run" capacitor
is
a high value. A centrifugal switch in the motor disconnects that once
it gets to some fraction of its nominal speed, and then only the "run"
capacitor is left in series with the second set of coils.
Capacitors passing AC have an impedance, analagous to resistance but
frequency dependant, so they dissipate energy proportional to their
impedance and the square of the current. The "start" capacitor is only
in circuit for a short time, so it doesn't need to be as robust as the
"run" capacitor, which will be dissipating energy all the time the
motor is running. Of course if the load on the motor is low, so is the
current, so the capacitors may not need to handle too much energy once
it's running normally.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York