Eric Smith wrote:
By default, DjVu uses lossy compression, which is
significantly smaller. But for archival purposes, I *much* prefer the
lossless coding. Should I decide to OCR the documents at a later date,
To be fair, DjVu lossy-encodes the graphics, not the text. One of the "selling
points" of the format is that B&W text is kept on its own lossless layer.
Also, G4 coding is a much better known standard. If
fifty years from
now someone has to build their own drive to read an ancient CD, and
discovers that it's full of compressed images, I think they've got a
much better chance of being able to decode G4 images since the format
is well-documented and well-known.
Agreed.
However, if someone else went to the trouble of
archiving a bunch of
old computer docs in DjVu, I'd still thank them for doing so, as it
is quite obviously much better to have the docs in DjVu format that
to not have them at all.
Heh, also agreed :-)
--
Jim Leonard (trixter(a)oldskool.org)
http://www.oldskool.org/
Want to help an ambitious games project?
http://www.mobygames.com/
Or check out some trippy MindCandy at
http://www.mindcandydvd.com/