> Come on
now, what you don't seem to remember is that it was less than
> half as expensive as any other similar machine at the time.
Only because >THE< IBM PC was the only other "similar" machine on the
market at the time! Even so, it was a poor bargain!
I mean similar in terms of standard features *NOT* IBM-PC compatibility.
BTW one reason the Sanyo was the first (choke!)
"compatible" machine on
the market and the reason that it had so many compatibility problems was
that it was designed as a CPM machine and converted to MS-DOS at the last
moment.
When it was first released, I don't believe that Sanyo made any
compatibility
claims.
> And no,
> I'm not prejudiced because I wrote the Byte magazine review of it. :)
Then I would like to wring your neck! I bought my 550 based on your
glowing report. You completely brushed over the compatibility and other
problems. Crap like that is the reason that I quit reading Byte. They
never told the truth about the SW and HW they were testing.
I'm very sorry that you felt mislead by my review. I'll have to go get my
copy, but I don't believe I made any compatibility claims. I pointed out
a number of the differences (in particular the sound system and the
keyboard).
I may have made mention of the upcoming CGA compatible graphics card and
that
the schematics indicated signals to be used to produce an expansion box with
IBM-PC compatible card slots.
Bill Sudbrink