17 May
2004
17 May
'04
3:10 p.m.
Should have been worded as follows:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ashley Carder" <wacarder(a)usit.net>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 3:05 PM
Subject: Re: RSTS/E and PDP 11/23
Paul, you probably know the answer to this.
I've seen this site before and wondered where the line is
that separates fact from fiction. Somewhere around 1990,
obviously, but the line has been craftily blurred by the author
of this 100th birthday thing. I have done studied my
*** "I have NOT studied my"
DEC / RSTS / PDP-11 history enough to pick out
anything
that is fictitious prior to stuff in the early 90s. Is everything
up to 1990 fact?
Ashley
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Koning" <pkoning(a)equallogic.com>
To: <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 2:53 PM
Subject: Re: RSTS/E and PDP 11/23
>>>> "bill" == bill bailey <beclassic(a)att.net> writes:
bill> Here's one person's notes: 1983 April-RSTS/E Version
bill> 8.0-06. Support for the recently announced PDP Micro 11/23
bill> system (RD51 10 megabyte disk, 2*RX50 400K byte floppies, 128K
bill> words memory).
bill> http://www.silverware.co.uk/rsts_80th_birthday.htm
Oh my goodness... that takes me back... (I thought it was a 100th
birthday article -- but in any case, that article or one very much
like it was presented at the RSTS 20th birthday celebration at New
Orleans DECUS.)
Thanks Bill!
paul