[PCs as terminals]
> The big advantage over a conventional
terminal
> was the capability of
> capturing output to a file or sending a file
Part of me still craves dedicated terminals
since they're just so reliable, and you can just swap
in another when it breaks. No (or few) stored settings.
Or alternaticely, erminals are genrally much easier to repair to compoent
level than PCs.
Incidentally,
the first PC I owned was a genuine 5160 PC/XT
(It still runs, it's in front of me now).
Nice! There's been a resurgence in appreciation
of the "classics".
MARCH: the NJ Vintage Computer Museum
has a 5100 and 5150 on display!
On my desk I haev (all operational) :
The hacked 5170 I am typing this on, and which I've described many times
before
The 5160 I just mentioned with 4 floppy drives, 2 hard drives, MDA and
CGA cards, 4 serial ports, 24 line user I/O (8255-based), etc. Not all
orignial IBM of course, although much fo the machine, incuding the
motherboard and keyboard are.
A CoCo 3 (512K, 2 drives, serial port, etc)
A PDP8/e with 32K words of real core, EAE boards, RK8e (not connected to
anything at the momnet), TU56, PC04 and RX01.
I think all of those would count as classic computers.
Reminds me of the tremrinal emiulator ROM for th
HP9830,
Sweet! Google found this for pix and desc:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HP_9800_series_desktop_computers
The best place to get information on these machines is
http://www.hpmuseum.net/ . Youy cna download a fair amount of
docuemtation...
My high school started everyone with programming BASIC
on the HP 9820A:
I find that hard to believe for one good reason. The HP9820 never ran
BASIC...
The HP9820 was HP's first infix-notation (as opposed to RPN/postfix)
calculator and used a language that developed into the 'HPL' of the 9825
etc.
The HP9830 was the machine in that family that ran BASIC. In many ways
it's the first personal computer, in that it was the first all-in-one
machine that you simply put on a desk, plugged into the mains, turned on
and started programming in BASIC.
You may have guessed I have something of a soft spot for these machines.
I own a 9810 (3 level stack RPN), 9820 amd 9830, and a considerable
number of the interfaces. One of my long-term goals is to get an HP9880
disk system for the 9830.
Things I like about them include :
-- They're one of the few bit-serial machines you are likely to find
(they're a lot more common than a PDP8/s for example) and that in itself
makes them interesting to me
-- The CPU is built mostly from TTL (there's no single-chip
microprocessor), so you can dive in with the logic analyser. On the other
hand, the machines are small enough to be easy to accomodate, unlike, say
a rack mounted minicomputer
-- They have the legendary HP build quality and though-out design.
-- Most faults can be easily fixed. Most of the electronic parts are
still easy to obtain -- the only custom ICs are the ROMs. The RAMs (1103
1K*1 DRAMs) are hard to find, though. The displays can fail and are vry
hard to get. But the TTL logic for the CPU and memory control is not a
problem. Debugging them is not too hard, but you do need a logic
analyser. Mechanical problems are normally just decayed rubber parts
(card reader rollers, printer platten), they can be replaced without too
much work.
-- A purely selfish rason. They are HP calculators, at least in name, and
are on the fringe of what HPCC (
http://www.hpcc.org/) covers. This group
is the only place where I get to meet like-minded people, and while I
would have problems if I wanted to chat about PDP11s all the time, I can
get away with mentionign the HP9830 ;-)
There are also some pictures on the aforemntioned site, and in my flickr
accound (tony_duell). The latter contains no pictures of the complete
machine, but it does show all the plug-in PCBs, repairing the printr and
card reader, etc.
-tony