________________________________
From: Tony Duell <ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk>
On Tue, 3 Jan 2012, Chris M wrote:
Oh if I had my way, every computer would have
BASIC in firmware or on
disk.
You betcha.
. . . and to supplement or ameliorate deficiencies in the firmware
version, there can be addtions to it on the disk!
. . . and, for those missing the firmware copy, put "Gee Whiz BASIC" on
the disk!
Actually, if I had my way, every computer would have Forth in the frimware.
I think it should be a on offence to sell something as a computer if it
does not compe with a programming language and the documentation to use
said language. After all, a computer is a programamed data processor,
and if you can't prgoram it, it's? not a computer.
-tony (only _half_ joking)
C: But BASIC is so well known. Most or nearly everything you learned on a TRS-80 model 3/4
could be utilized straitaway on a peecee. Yes BASIC and BASICA added features, but those
are bonus'! The Tandy 2000 DOS/BASIC manuals (can't remember if they were
distinct, probably) as a fer instance were pretty well written and comprehensive AFAIK (no
manual is perfect though).
? How many puters came with M$ BASIC?
?I don't know the first thing about FORTH, sorry. But all I know is a whole nudda
world was available to the curious little punk who cared to get their hands a little
dirty. I have no reason to hate BASIC. Ideal for all tasks, definitely not. But even Quick
BASIC wasn't so bad for some things. A number of developers were and still are fond of
Quick C for quick and dirty stuff (I know that statement astounds people, but it's
true just the same). And I'm no big fan of M$, but that has nothing to do w/finding
one of their tools as moderately useful. Not everyone on this list is a developer, or
needs to work solely in the most modern methodologies.