24 Sep
1999
24 Sep
'99
10:47 a.m.
<I seem to remember it being in a Terminals/Comms handbook (which I can't
<find at the moment :-(), where it claimed that the PDT11 was _not_ a
<PDP11, since it didn't have a Unibus/Qbus on it.
Didn't say it wasn't there. Only that at that time for marketing reasons
it was "improper" to call it a PDP-11.
<The PDP11 Architecture Handbook is inconsistent. It describes the 'Two
<PDP11 Expansion Buses' but also calls the PRO300-series 'A PDP11 family
<member'.
As I said. a few years later...
Allison