29 Apr
2016
29 Apr
'16
12:13 p.m.
On 29 Apr 2016, at 21:10 , Paul Koning <paulkoning
at comcast.net> wrote:
I'm guessing Ben means threaded as in "Threaded Interpretative Language",
and not a concurrent programming language.
There are still plenty of Forth implementations based on threading (of words).
On Apr 29, 2016, at 3:01 PM, ben <bfranchuk at
jetnet.ab.ca> wrote:
I liked Forth when it was still threaded.
???
Base FORTH is not, in and of itself, threaded. PolyFORTH was if memory serves. Then
again, creating a thread scheduler (cooperative scheduler) for FORTH is just a modest
exercise for the programmer.