On Oct 31, 2011, at 6:17 PM, Tony Duell wrote:
Joke-a-side..
If multiplexing really did save power then just pulsing a
single led would do the same..
Multiplexing of LED displays was intially done, I think, to save
connections. If you think of an 8-digit calculator display (with 7
segmets + a decimal point per digit), that's 64 LEDs, so 64 conenctions
to the display (+ a common return). If you multiplex it, that's 16
connetions, 8 for the segments (one for the top, one ofthe top right
vertical, etc) and 8 to select the digits (one per dgiti).
Most of the time, these days, that's all it's used for; I've seen some app
notes where, if you're really clever, you can drive 4 LEDs per pin (plus 1 extra)
without any additional external electronics. Very nice for either pin-constrained micros
or large sets of LEDs.
For example, most cheap clock radios have one 4-pin DIP running the whole show (and
it's pretty much been the same chip since the '80s). It uses the 60/50 Hz zero
crossing on the AC line to keep time, which gives it very precise time (Laurent Hammond,
inventor of the AC synchronized motor which ran both home clocks and the Hammond organ,
took advantage of this and now the power companies must make sure that the power cycles
average 60/50 Hz over the day to a few ppm, if anecdotes inform correctly) and also gives
it a handy time base for multiplexing half the LED segments. Normally, as mentioned
earlier, a 60 Hz refresh frequency might cause a headache, but I imagine there are holdup
caps on the LEDs so they're not quite so obnoxious.
- Dave