29 May
2009
29 May
'09
3:59 a.m.
Chuck Guzis wrote:
Perhaps, but I don't think that's what was
intended. As cool a word
as "boustrophodonic" is, I think "bidirectional" is more accurate,
implying nothing more than a change in direction.
My interpretation of the claim was that under certain conditions
(firmware bug? misconfiguration?),
it would get out of sync and actual print text in the reverse character
sequence of what was intended. I've never seen this happen, but it's
easy to imagine it being the result of a firmware bug.
Eric