Modern source projects (was Re: difference between Quick

Sure, sure... you can sacrifice and use it, but for anyone who needs it for professional work would be foolish to use it over one of the commercial offerings. ________________________________ From: Cameron Kaiser <spectre at floodgap.com> To: cctalk at classiccmp.org Sent: Wed, April 13, 2011 3:47:09 PM Subject: Re: Modern source projects (was Re: difference between Quick I have to agree. Photoshop is much better than the GIMP, even though the GIMP certainly has the price advantage. Couldn't work without it. But that doesn't mean that the GIMP isn't useful for people with lower-end needs, of course. -- ------------------------------------ personal: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ -- Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * ckaiser at floodgap.com -- The reader this message encounters not failing to understand is cursed. ----