22 Nov
2007
22 Nov
'07
12:11 a.m.
Chuck Guzis wrote:
Nope, the early 386 machines were pretty lame. Anyone
else have the
same experience with the SX vis-a-vis a 286?
Could you quantify "lame"? I used a 386sx-16 for years and it was
always faster (visibly, not just via benchmarks) than the 12MHz 286 I
had access to. If you're going to claim a 12Mhz 286 was faster than a
16MHz 386sx you'll have to provide some evidence...
--
Jim Leonard (trixter at oldskool.org) http://www.oldskool.org/
Help our electronic games project: http://www.mobygames.com/
Or check out some trippy MindCandy at http://www.mindcandydvd.com/
A child borne of the home computer wars: http://trixter.wordpress.com/