word processor history -- interesting article (Evan Koblentz)

On 8 July 2016 at 04:33, Rod Smallwood <rodsmallwood52 at btinternet.com> wrote: :-) WordStar commands are still used in some things, such as JOE. However, they went away before the GUI era and are mostly now forgotten. Including by you! ;-) WordPerfect replaced WordStar on DOS. It was a lot more capable and it had superb printer-driver support. Then Windows (and MacOS and GUIs in general) swept WordPerfect away. The printer drivers issue became irrelevant when the OS handled the printers and font rendering etc., and most users much preferred the GUI model of text-editing to the WordPerfect embedded-control-codes model. Interestingly, more things seem to understand the Vi keystrokes now, at least on Unix. Although I'm something of an old-timer too, dating from before the PC era and learning CP/M and VAX-VMS before I ever set hands on an IBM anything. I cordially dislike both Vi & Emacs: I grew up with keyboards with cursor and delete keys, but they didn't have META or SUPER or any of that guff. I disliked WordStar (which I found arcane and clunky even when it was still current and on retail sale), WordPerfect (all function-keys all the time, needed a keyboard template or eidetic memory). I also knew and supported MultiMate, DisplayWrite, MS Word for DOS and others. I used LocoScript at home, which replaced The Last Word on my ZX Spectrum. I admit I liked LocoScript but it had the benefit of a dedicated keyboard intended for a word-processor. MS Word was my favourite DOS wordprocessor -- even before CUA, I found its menu structure and editing keystrokes (select a block, _then_ format it) logical. And it could do WYSIWYG *bold* and _underline_ and /italic/ on screen, even on a PC text display. But when I got my hands on early Macs and Windows 2 in my first job, I discovered the CUA model, and I've liked it ever since. I still miss CUA editing on the Linux command line. There are some: http://liam-on-linux.livejournal.com/42908.html ... But they're all nonstandard, not widely supported or have restrictions. Anyway. the keystrokes you describe are the now-ubiquitous, on GUIs at least, CUA keystrokes -- in their later incarnation, with some cross-fertilisation from the Mac HCI guidelines. Everyone follows them and I think that's a really good thing. -- Liam Proven ? Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? GMail/G+/Twitter/Flickr/Facebook: lproven MSN: lproven at hotmail.com ? Skype/AIM/Yahoo/LinkedIn: liamproven Cell/Mobiles: +44 7939-087884 (UK) ? +420 702 829 053 (?R)