21 Dec
2005
21 Dec
'05
2:44 a.m.
List members,
I reach the point that I need to decide what license I will use when
I release my project. I myself do not have a preference. I am planning
to replace the unknown-license 53C90 sample code with linux or NetBSD
53C90 driver code. If I use the linux code, I have to release it with
GPL. If I use the NetBSD code, I am not able to release it in GPL. I
will let you guys decide, since you are the end users. To avoid
flooding the mailing list, you can send me private email if you do not
have a public message.
When I release the project, only 512 B/B CDROM and HD will be
supported. There might be a need to add support for other format
CDROMs (easy) or SCSI tapes (difficult) or other devices down the
road. Bear this in mind when you vote.
cheers,
vax, 9000
Well, I'm a potential user[1], after all, I am definitely interested
in MSCP SCSI :^) My vote is for a BSD style license.
Zane
[1] I must confess I'm less of a potential user than many people here
with DEC HW as I use Viking QDT and UDT boards, however, I've watched
this when I have time with interest.
--
--
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Administrator |
| healyzh at aracnet.com (primary) | OpenVMS Enthusiast |
| MONK::HEALYZH (DECnet) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| PDP-10 Emulation and Zane's Computer Museum. |
| http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |