24 Sep
2004
24 Sep
'04
9:58 a.m.
>>>> "Jim" == Jim Isbell
<millenniumfalcon(a)cableone.net> writes:
Jim> I find it interesting that the Democrats are now claiming the
Jim> Gore won the popular vote but lost the electorial vote. Gore
Jim> DID NOT win the popular vote either.
Maybe he did, maybe not, I don't really remember. It's irrelevant;
the constitution says that it doesn't work that way.
If that ever changes, then candidates will run their elections VERY
differently. You'll never see a candidate in New Hampshire again, for
example.
paul