We will get several comments after this post...
I hope y'all will correct me.
The acoustic coupler on the old teletype was 1200 baud, 10 characters per
sec. to match the machine. It was FSK (Frequency Shift Keying) with two
tones 1200hz and 2400hz for 0 and one. Depending on the # of start, stop
bits in the serial stream and parity baud .NE. bytes/sec.
Phone lines have a 2500hz bandwidth, and today's modems use QAM (Quadrature
Amplitude Modulation). You can visualize this if you think of a signal as a
rotating vector on an xy grid - say a constant sine at constant amplitude
would represent a circle.
put 4 points uniformly on the circle and XY grid, and you have 4 QAM. 16
points (rectangular array, not on the unit circle), 16-QAM etc. Each point
represents 2 bits in 4-QAM (dibits), and 4 bits in 16-QAM. this is called
the signal constellation.
To further encode the signal and reduce errors, they use techniques called
viterbi and trellis encoding, these limit the accepted signal transition
from one dibit, qbit to another.
In addition, modern modems train the channel. That's the white noise you
hear at the beginning of the dialup - both ends are doing equalization for
this connection. If errors occur, they fall back to lower data rates and
retrain.
Our 56K modems never get there here in the US, it is an FCC limit, and the
reasons I am not sure.
These basic principles above also apply to cell/radio transmission. There
are other goodies they can throw into the algorithms to reduce multipath
reflection (ghosts, as in TV) due to buildings objects, aircraft.
to conclude, Ill bet with a homemade cell phone acoustic coupler to -> RJ-45
jack interface you could get same performance as dialup, near 56K.
Needed:
Sponge/muffs to adapt the cell handset
electrostatic mic/speaker
some op amp stuff to get the signals leveled
resolve the dial-in and dial-out issues to fool the PC for dial tone and
auto answer (and interface to the cell keypad to answer and send)
Randy
From: Chris M <chrism3667 at yahoo.com>
Reply-To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic
Posts"<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
To: talk <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: pretty much OT: acoustic coupling
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 13:39:38 -0700 (PDT)
my application anyway. What is the typical maximum
speed of such a device, be it antiquated (I actually
used to have one of the old Radio Shack units), or
home-brewed.
And lookee, here's what I had:
http://cgi.ebay.com/RADIO-SHACK-ACOUSTIC-COUPLER-MODEM-
TRS-80-AC-3_W0QQitemZ180098721480QQcategoryZ80229QQss
PageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
In fact, that's an acoustic modem. What I'd like to
implement is a "bridge" if you will between a modem
and a cellular device that would allow connection to
the internet. Ingenious, no? ;)
Please, no one tell me about software and such that's
presently available on the market. I'm aware of it,
own 99% of it, and I'll say here and now it's flakey
at best.
The technology is antiquated enough, albeit not the
application. O woe is me :(
____________________________________________________________________________________
We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love
(and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list.
http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/265
_________________________________________________________________
5.5%* 30 year fixed mortgage rate. Good credit refinance. Up to 5 free
quotes - *Terms
https://www2.nextag.com/goto.jsp?product=100000035&url=%2fst.jsp&tm…