THANK GOD...someone else who Gets It!
You're not alone, you two...[...]
It's a fun gadget for a 30 year old
computer.
True. In this particular case, for many people, there's nothing wrong
with it.
But I do think it's important that people contemplating handing their
data to someone else be at least aware enough of the issues to make an
intelligent decision about when it does and doesn't matter, for that
user and that data.
Get over yourselves.
Yeah, that'll sure help calm the discussion down.
However, whining about storing disk images for your
Commodore 64 on a
remote site is just f*cking stupid.
...because of course nobody ever uses a C=64 for anything for which
privacy is important.
Right. Really cogent argument, that.
Phrased so politely, too.
And to get back to the subject, there are reasons beyond privacy for
not pushing data out to third parties. In particular, it's easy to
lose access to that data, either temporarily or permanently, for
reasons beyond your easy control. If I were playing with C=64 code, it
would quite annoy me if things suddenly stopped working temporarily
because some provider half a continent away failed...or permanently
because some company failed.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse at
rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B