Chuck Guzis wrote:
8086s and were somewhat zippier than the 5150. They
did the job. I
don't know if any of the Stearns PCs made it into collections.
I wonder how many of the PC-compatible-yet-goofy-hardware 808x clones
have been lost to the ages. I still own my AT&T PC 6300, proprietary
640x400 (not a typo) monitor and all, and consider it just barely
compatible enough to hold onto. (I have pretty high standards; I can
count the number of apps/games that will never run on it on both hands).
Then again, who am I kidding; it was the first PC that our family
personally owned (father was AT&T employee) so I'd probably try to keep
it going no matter what.
A friend had a Sperry machine capable of many more colors than CGA could
produce, although the monitor (also proprietary connector IIRC) was some
sort of slow-response phosphor -- it was like working in front of a
"color" monochrome monitor, if that makes any sense. It ran "best"
with
it's OEM-customized version of MS-DOS, and ran about 90% of the apps out
there. It's level of compatibility was incredibly frustrating; hardware
bangers like Music Construction Set (heavy timer usage, direct writes to
screen RAM, direct disk sector loads, etc.) worked perfectly, while
Sorcim's SuperWriter word processor -- a fairly creampuff app -- would
lock the machine up. Crazy machine!!
--
Jim Leonard (trixter at
oldskool.org)
http://www.oldskool.org/
Help our electronic games project:
http://www.mobygames.com/
Or check out some trippy MindCandy at
http://www.mindcandydvd.com/
A child borne of the home computer wars:
http://trixter.wordpress.com/