To get back on topic about babbage's drawings,
from what I read it was mechnical design that
could not be produced with 18th century mechanical
enginering.
That's often been conjectured, but, as usual, reality is somewhat
more complicated. Most other craftsmen probably couldn't have
produced what he designed. Along the way, he invented new
techniques of fabrication and management as well as computation.
However, he probably could have built it. He did build a small
version that operated as he intended. And part of the reason for
the construction project at the Science Museum was to determine
if the materials and tools of the time could have built the machine.
In the end, much of the reason he never built a full version of his
designs was that he was too much the stereotypical engineer.
Almost nobody except Ada could get along with him and he made
a number of enemies among those who would fund his work.
The money situation led to a dispute with his primary craftsman
who walked out with all the custom tools they had made. Then
as he was considering his options, he realized that he could
improve his design many fold and so dropped his efforts on the
difference engine in favor of the analytical engine. Even with that
machine, he kept stopping his efforts to realize it because he
was sure that he could build his new design faster than he could
finish the work he had started on the previous version. As I recall,
there were over 40 different designs for the analytical engine by
the time it was done, and he had never built a full version of any
of them. After his death, his son did assemble a small version
of one of the designs for the mill including some parts that
Babbage had already fabricated before his death.
There's no question Babbage was ahead of his time in many
ways. But he was also understood the materials and tools
well enough to design a machine that he felt confident he
could actually build.
BLS