On 10/13/19 2:46 PM, Noel Chiappa via cctalk wrote:
From: Chuck
Guzis
Calling DIBOL "COBOL-like" is
stretching things quite a bit.
OK, so I'll change it to "vaguely COBOL-like"... :-)
Seriously, though, there some high-level similarities, and not just
the purpose...
One could argue that it's just as similar to FORTRAN (cf. computed GOTO
and logical IF statements). Where it differs mainly from FORTRAN of the
times is a facility for record layout, which didn't come along in
FORTRAN for a couple of decades. (I'm trying to recall if it was part
of F90).
--Chuck