Jim Leonard wrote:
Chris M wrote:
Jay, something really should be said and
moreover
done about language like that being used on the list.
On the flip side, doing so is censorship... if you consider the list a
public forum... which it isn't :-) (It's provided by a private entity)
Nothing wrong with a little censorship in the context of this mailing
list. If someone wanted to post commercial ads or actually had text
with truly explicit sexual content then few people would disagree with
censoring that content (heck we'd just need to create a news group if
that's what we wanted right :). This is not to say that I necessarily
agree about censoring Sellam though. By their very nature topic
specific forums have implicit censoring if not very explicit censoring.