On Fri, 7 Oct 2005 06:56:49 +0200
"Nico de Jong" <nico at FARUMDATA.DK> wrote:
Fra: "Chuck Guzis" <cclist at
sydex.com>
That said, give me 8" diskettes any day over 5.25" and 3.5" when it
comes to
reliability. I've got diskettes from 1976 that read as well as
when
they were new. I have 3.5" DSHD diskettes that won't read right a
month after purchase.
I couldnt have said that better
Nico
Think about the density of the data on the diskettes (this is not a
comment meant as a defense for the poor quality of magnetic media, just
part of the discussion) A 1.44M floppy diskette puts a lot more data in
a smaller area. The highest density 8" media I ever had was DSDD, or
720K on the big 8" surface. That's a LOT larger disk and hence a much
lower density.
Plus, the world of computers today has a lot more room for
junk/commodity media. Anybody using floppy diskettes in 1976 had
serious heavy-duty reasons for doing so. And those diskettes were
EXPENSIVE. The disks you can get now at the Walgreens or a grocery
store aren't the same. Further, there's no market for a high quality
diskette, because 'high quality' customers have moved on to newer
mediums.
I got handed a new shrinkwrapped box of 8" diskettes recently at work.
Finally everybody there is getting to know I am the person to hand stuff
to. I'm soon to get a nice desktop HP pen plotter, too.