At 09:36 PM 1/12/2015, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2015-01-13 03:19, Rick Murphy wrote:
At 01:17 PM 1/12/2015, Johnny Billquist wrote:
And of course, you also have things like OS/8,
which runs with
interrupts off at all times, to which the answer to the original
question would be "OS/8". :-)
The OS/8 FORTRAN runtime (FRTS) runs with interrupts enabled. OS/8 in
general doesn't care if interrupts are on, which is how OS/78 (or was it
OS/278?) symbionts worked. So, you can't blame OS/8 for getting into the
way. There's nothing typically in OS/8 that requires interrupts to be
disabled, but it's true that most of OS/8 doesn't do anything to handle
interrrupts.
Well, not entirely true. Yes, FRTS runs with interrupts enabled. But
it disables them before jumping into OS/8, unless I remember wrong.
Well, not entirely relevant. You recommended that I 'Read the thread'
but I did. I'm responding to the misinformed statements that OS/8
always runs with interrupts disabled, which is false. FRTS basically
requires that I/O drivers be set up before execution starts, so no OS/8
I/O handlers are called once the runtime gets running (assuming just
FORTRAN source.)
ADVENT does dynamic unit assignment, and wraps OS/8 USR calls to
disable/enable interrupts.
It's been a very long time since I mucked around
inside FRTS...
It's been a few months or so for me :) And yes, OS/8 drivers can be
called with interrupts enabled.
Interrupt
latency? Either you're looking for the length of the "skip
chain", or interrupt blockers like CIF instructions.
Continue reading the thread. Seems he's looking for the hardware
response to the raising of the interrupt pin on the CPU, and I assume
under the condition that interrupts are enabled.
I've read the thread, which is why I brought up the CIF stall, since
nobody else has mentioned it.
Maybe that's not what's being asked here, but if you're asking what can
cause latency with interrupts enabled once a device generates an
interrupt, the fact that CIF instructions delay interrupts until the
next JMP instruction seems to be what's being asked here.
-Rick