9 May
2001
9 May
'01
7:25 a.m.
On Wednesday, May 9, 2001, at 01:23 PM, Iggy Drougge wrote:
The specs I referenced above are those put out by NEC for that
monitor. It's doubtful that the II would do be able to do 800 x 600 in
it's vertical freq. range, which is why NEC lists it as a max.
resolution of 800 x 560. I believe at that resolution they list it at a
vert. freq. of 56 Hz. Even if it could take the vertical freq. low
enough to get to 800 x 600 I wouldn't want to have to look at it. 56 Hz
will flicker enough as it is.
Jeff
The II would
do unlimited colors in analog mode and up to 64
colors in TTL mode. It's vertical freq range was 50 - 80 Hz with a
maximum resolution of 800 x 560. I believe the 2a was the first to
be able to reach 800 x 600, though the upgrade to the GS also was
able to. It's horizontal freq. range was 15.5 - 35 khz.
How do you define resolution at the monitor level? I've always been
able to
get entirely different resolutions out of monitors, and why would they
disagree? If it's an analogue signal, wouldn't the monitor just sweep
along
and project whatever is input?